If I had a dollar for every time a friend, student, or family member asked me "What do you think of Sarah Palin?" I' d be able to afford a doorknob on one of those seven homes John McCain can't keep track of. Or is it ten? I can't keep track of all his homes either. So, what do I think of the Palin pick? Do I find her a "credible" candidate as some of my family members do? Honestly, I don't have any idea about whether or not she's VP material. What concerns me more than whether or not she has the skill set to do the job is the reason why I believe she was chosen: to
reignite the culture wars.
The day McCain made the announcement I set off in search of Palin's biography. As I've been something of a political junky this election cycle, I already knew a bit about her but I didn't know where she stood on the major issues of the campaign. There wasn't much to find in relation to policy issues. What I did find filled me with a sense of dread. Most articles reported little about her positions on social, economic, or foreign policy. Instead, readers were treated to a list of her conservative leanings: traditional family values, NRA, pro-life [1], interprets Bible literally, supports creatonism in school, pray away the gay, so on and so forth. By the time I finished reading several pieces, the direction of the McCain campaign was perfectly clear. Palin's RNC speech confirmed my suspicions [2]. While we won't hear it directly from the candidates, I suspect we're going to hear a great deal about the Left's war on Christianity/Xmas/Family Values/Morality/[insert any belief associated with evangelical Christianity here]. If you can't win on the substantive issues--and I think this was becoming clear to the McCain campaign that this was case [3]--you need to muddy the waters by introducing a social crisis centered on cultural values. McCain/Palin will do away with the Red State/Blue State talk while creating new divisions along cultural lines.
And this is what politics has come down to in 2008. It's not about issues like the economy, wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, healthcare, energy policy, etc. Instead, it's going to be about dividing the country according to class, education level, and religion. Fantastic!
[1] For the record, choosing to carry a Down sydrome baby to term is NOT a pro-life position and does not make one a saint. Many pro-choice parents make exactly the same decision.
[2] Contrary to most of the pundits and analysts, I did not evaluate her speech favorably. I think there's a way to critique your opponent--harshly--without mocking them. While her delivery was good, the entire speech amounted to little more than an ad hominem attack. Being the latte sipping liberal elitist that I am, I'm immune to such Sith mind games. If I understand my position as a member of the liberal elite correctly, I also have to make sure and acknowledge that the weak minded fools who constitute most of the US will surely fall for this kind of political pandering.
[3] Let's face it, the Bush administration has made an issues based campaign virtually impossible for the Republicans. Did the McCain camp have any other choice than to reignite the culture wars? Not if they want to win, unfortunately. I'm not a political scientist, but I think this is probably McCain's best chance at winning the election.