Delusional
I'm sure most people have heard of or read about Morgan Spurlock's Super Size Me. Although I haven't seen the film, the documentary follows a man's attempts to eat nothing but McDonalds for an entire month. The other interesting twist is that he always says "yes" when asked if he'd like to "Super Size" his meal. Just about anyone can predict the outcome.
What surprises me more than the outcome of the documentary is the distorted self-image of many U.S. Americans. Most people, even when overweight, don't see themselves as such. In fact, 6 of 10 overweight folk believe they're at a healthy weight. Take this blogger, for example.
He talks as if 5' 9" and 170-175 pounds is a reasonable weight (his post inspired this rant, by the way). Are you kidding me?! Sorry David, but that's well outside the range of healthy. Unless you're some kind of ripped body builder, you probably need to shed at least 10 pounds.
And this, I think, is the more important idea to take away from Super Size Me. As U.S. Americans, we have a horribley distorted view of what it means to be fit and healthy. Most people don't eat fast food for every meal. They do, however, overeat at almost every meal. Even if we're not at McDonalds, we treat ourselves to super sized portions. Additionally, most American's don't get nearly enough exercise. The National Academies' Institute of Medicine recommends one hour of cummulative exercise EACH DAY. Those of us who manage to meet the one hour exercise minimum and eat reasonably rarely have to concern ourselves with weight issues.
For the last seven years, I've been a vegetarian. Naturally, my fat and calorie intake is pretty low. I also exercise for about an hour each day, 40 minutes of which is running or swimming. For the last seven years, my weight hasn't fluctuated more than 5 lbs. At 5' 9", my weight has stayed within the 137-142 lb range. For most of that period my weight has stayed between 138-140. Granted, I'm at the low end of the Body Mass Index.
If people had a more realistic notion regarding eating right and exercise, we wouldn't need films like Super Size Me to tell us we're a bunch of lazy gluttons.
For a really good laugh, read the comments on the linked blog. Check out all the people trying to dismiss the negative effects of smoking and passive smoke. As a smoker who presently isn't smoking (I can't begin to explain how much I freaking miss cigarettes), I'll be the first to admit smoking is the root of many health evils. If you're going to smoke, drop the denial gig and admit you're risking serious health issues (and exposing others to those risks, too). Even when I was smoking, I was crystal clear about what I was doing to myself. It's a choice, and a choice that will probably lead to negative health consequences.
Smoke 'em if you got 'em.
Monday, May 31, 2004
Friday, May 28, 2004
End of An Era . . . And Quality Television
Kathleen and I watched an episode from the 3rd season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer last night. Since last summer, we've been slowly making our way through each of the seasons--we're about halfway through the Season Three DVD collection. As the episode ended, Kathleen remarked, "It's kind of depressing to realize that there won't be any new episodes of Angel or Buffy next year." I agreed.
I've ranted about this repeatedly, but I'm going to say it again. As the following link emphasizes, through a farewell to Angel oddly enough, quality television is on the verge of extinction. The corporate money mongers of the media giants don't care about quality, only profit. Quality, thought-provoking television with small, but dedicated, fan-bases simply doesn't bring in enough cash. For whatever reason, the majority of the U.S. public isn't interested in sophisticated television. Instead, viewers are content to consume the crap that is reality television. Aaarrrggghhh! The very thought of another season of Bachelor, Bachelorette, Average Joe, or American Idol drives me nuts!
Anyway, here's a great piece about the end of Angel . . . and quality television.
Reality television is taking over, make no mistake, and it’s primarily because it’s so inexpensive. Point a camera at some exhibitionistic moron and let it run. No need for writers or story editors or effects people or even actors. And because people just keep watching and watching this stuff, the ad revenue keeps pouring in, and with a smaller production cost than even your most low-rent scripted show, the profit margin is immense. It makes sense. It sucks, but it makes sense.
The casualty is quality television, of course. Television that challenges and moves while it entertains, television that utilizes the medium’s inherent serial nature to really connect an audience with characters’ lives, television that goes beyond what television normally tries. Just look at Joss Whedon’s recent history: Buffy ended at seven seasons through a mutual agreement between Whedon and star Sarah Michelle Gellar, but his fledgling (and fantastic) Firefly was unceremoniously dumped after half a season, and Angel was hacked off at the knees during one of its most successful runs.
Kathleen and I watched an episode from the 3rd season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer last night. Since last summer, we've been slowly making our way through each of the seasons--we're about halfway through the Season Three DVD collection. As the episode ended, Kathleen remarked, "It's kind of depressing to realize that there won't be any new episodes of Angel or Buffy next year." I agreed.
I've ranted about this repeatedly, but I'm going to say it again. As the following link emphasizes, through a farewell to Angel oddly enough, quality television is on the verge of extinction. The corporate money mongers of the media giants don't care about quality, only profit. Quality, thought-provoking television with small, but dedicated, fan-bases simply doesn't bring in enough cash. For whatever reason, the majority of the U.S. public isn't interested in sophisticated television. Instead, viewers are content to consume the crap that is reality television. Aaarrrggghhh! The very thought of another season of Bachelor, Bachelorette, Average Joe, or American Idol drives me nuts!
Anyway, here's a great piece about the end of Angel . . . and quality television.
Reality television is taking over, make no mistake, and it’s primarily because it’s so inexpensive. Point a camera at some exhibitionistic moron and let it run. No need for writers or story editors or effects people or even actors. And because people just keep watching and watching this stuff, the ad revenue keeps pouring in, and with a smaller production cost than even your most low-rent scripted show, the profit margin is immense. It makes sense. It sucks, but it makes sense.
The casualty is quality television, of course. Television that challenges and moves while it entertains, television that utilizes the medium’s inherent serial nature to really connect an audience with characters’ lives, television that goes beyond what television normally tries. Just look at Joss Whedon’s recent history: Buffy ended at seven seasons through a mutual agreement between Whedon and star Sarah Michelle Gellar, but his fledgling (and fantastic) Firefly was unceremoniously dumped after half a season, and Angel was hacked off at the knees during one of its most successful runs.
Summer Readings List
In addition to disserting, I'm trying to catch up on some reading. Here's the list of books I'd like to read this summer.
Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity
Samuel Adams: America's Revolutionary Politician*
In the Fascist Bathroom: Punk in Pop Music, 1977-1992
Siouxsie and the Banshees: The Authorized Biography
The Fortress of Solitude: A Novel
Soul of the Fire
Faith of the Fallen
*I wrote my MA thesis on Samuel Adams. He's always been my rabblerouser of choice.
In addition to disserting, I'm trying to catch up on some reading. Here's the list of books I'd like to read this summer.
Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity
Samuel Adams: America's Revolutionary Politician*
In the Fascist Bathroom: Punk in Pop Music, 1977-1992
Siouxsie and the Banshees: The Authorized Biography
The Fortress of Solitude: A Novel
Soul of the Fire
Faith of the Fallen
*I wrote my MA thesis on Samuel Adams. He's always been my rabblerouser of choice.
Thursday, May 27, 2004
They Did It Too!
Do the recent articles about coalition partners also engaging in prisoner abuse smack of something a kid would say? I'm sure at one time or another, my mother or father busted me for doing something I shouldn't have been doing. I suspect there was a time when I pointed at my younger sister and whined, "But she did it, too" just take some of the heat off myself. It's a tried and true rhetorical tactic that those of us with siblings learn at a very early age. Of course, when you're the older sibling you're familiar with the parental resonse: "As her older brother, we expect you to set a good example."
As a citizen of the United States of the Empire, I'll step up and say it. We're supposed to be the leaders of the free world, the champions of democracy, and the protectors of all that is good! I expect you, the leaders of this country and the members of the military, to set a good example. Don't give me any of that lip about Poland and other coalition countries. I'm very disappointed in your behavior. You should know better. Now go to your room!
If it was only that simple.
Do the recent articles about coalition partners also engaging in prisoner abuse smack of something a kid would say? I'm sure at one time or another, my mother or father busted me for doing something I shouldn't have been doing. I suspect there was a time when I pointed at my younger sister and whined, "But she did it, too" just take some of the heat off myself. It's a tried and true rhetorical tactic that those of us with siblings learn at a very early age. Of course, when you're the older sibling you're familiar with the parental resonse: "As her older brother, we expect you to set a good example."
As a citizen of the United States of the Empire, I'll step up and say it. We're supposed to be the leaders of the free world, the champions of democracy, and the protectors of all that is good! I expect you, the leaders of this country and the members of the military, to set a good example. Don't give me any of that lip about Poland and other coalition countries. I'm very disappointed in your behavior. You should know better. Now go to your room!
If it was only that simple.
Guest Starring Al Gore as The Voice of Reason
You know something is wrong with the political system when Al Gore, the former Vice President and loser of the 2000 election campaign, is one of the few making any sense.
"George W. Bush promised us a foreign policy with humility. Instead, he has brought us humiliation in the eyes of the world."
If Gore had campaigned with this kind of fire, he'd be President right now.
You know something is wrong with the political system when Al Gore, the former Vice President and loser of the 2000 election campaign, is one of the few making any sense.
"George W. Bush promised us a foreign policy with humility. Instead, he has brought us humiliation in the eyes of the world."
If Gore had campaigned with this kind of fire, he'd be President right now.
Wednesday, May 26, 2004
The Way the Music Died
If you're interested in the present state of music and the music industry, tune in to Frontline on Thursday night. The program will focus on how "MTV, compact discs, corporate consolidation, Internet piracy, and greed have contributed to a perfect storm for the recording industry. FRONTLINE examines how the business that has provided the soundtrack of the lives of a generation is on the verge of collapse."
If you're interested in the present state of music and the music industry, tune in to Frontline on Thursday night. The program will focus on how "MTV, compact discs, corporate consolidation, Internet piracy, and greed have contributed to a perfect storm for the recording industry. FRONTLINE examines how the business that has provided the soundtrack of the lives of a generation is on the verge of collapse."
Tuesday, May 25, 2004
Cringe Worthy
I can't stop looking at the following links. It's like a horrible car wreck, but funny.
The Justice League of My Little Ponies
The Justice League of My Little Ponies: Dialogue!
I can't stop looking at the following links. It's like a horrible car wreck, but funny.
The Justice League of My Little Ponies
The Justice League of My Little Ponies: Dialogue!
Which Magickal Order are You In?

You are an Elementalist. Your magic stems from the
forces of nature. You might be a forest
nuturing Druid, a storm-creating Weather-Wizard
or any of the many Elementals, but one thing is
sure-- your bond with nature is strong. You can
rely heavily on nature to support yourself
aesthetically or physically for it lends you
both comfort and strength. Your instincts
rarely fail you. You are vibrantly passionate
but are sometimes carried away by your own
emotions.
Which Magical Order Are You In?
brought to you by Quizilla

You are an Elementalist. Your magic stems from the
forces of nature. You might be a forest
nuturing Druid, a storm-creating Weather-Wizard
or any of the many Elementals, but one thing is
sure-- your bond with nature is strong. You can
rely heavily on nature to support yourself
aesthetically or physically for it lends you
both comfort and strength. Your instincts
rarely fail you. You are vibrantly passionate
but are sometimes carried away by your own
emotions.
Which Magical Order Are You In?
brought to you by Quizilla
Sunday, May 23, 2004
More Nonsense Names
Last night on VH1's Best Week Ever, several actors, musicians, and comics commented on the name of Gwyneth Paltrow's new baby (Apple). The topic lead to a general discussion of the wacky names stars give their children. For instance, Jason Lee apparently named his child Pilot Inspektor. What? Who could forget Dweezil and Moon Unit Zappa? One of the comedians on the show suggested a great name: Steelwool Wombat! In honor of wacky child names, or the horror of wacky child names, I've decided to offer a list using objects found in my home office.
Bamboo Hematite
Rune Kneebrace
Converse Incense
CD Staple
Button Lipbalm
Kleenex Paperweight
Stickynote Ticketstub
Amethyst Smudgestick
Gargoyle Tealight
Socks Hoseclamp
Boxfan Candlestick
Lampshade PowerPuff
Slate Coffeemug
Thesaurus Lunchbox
Altoid Envelope
Snowglobe Bookend
Scissors Litterbox
Picking a reasonable name is the first step in good parenting. These stars are setting their kids up for a boatload of teasing. Sheesh.
Last night on VH1's Best Week Ever, several actors, musicians, and comics commented on the name of Gwyneth Paltrow's new baby (Apple). The topic lead to a general discussion of the wacky names stars give their children. For instance, Jason Lee apparently named his child Pilot Inspektor. What? Who could forget Dweezil and Moon Unit Zappa? One of the comedians on the show suggested a great name: Steelwool Wombat! In honor of wacky child names, or the horror of wacky child names, I've decided to offer a list using objects found in my home office.
Bamboo Hematite
Rune Kneebrace
Converse Incense
CD Staple
Button Lipbalm
Kleenex Paperweight
Stickynote Ticketstub
Amethyst Smudgestick
Gargoyle Tealight
Socks Hoseclamp
Boxfan Candlestick
Lampshade PowerPuff
Slate Coffeemug
Thesaurus Lunchbox
Altoid Envelope
Snowglobe Bookend
Scissors Litterbox
Picking a reasonable name is the first step in good parenting. These stars are setting their kids up for a boatload of teasing. Sheesh.
Wednesday, May 19, 2004
Get Crackin'!
According to Democratic Presidential hopeful John Kerry, "I'll lure those who support Nader. Really? Well, he'd better get crackin'. To this point, I haven't seen anything that makes me want to vote for Bush-lite. To lure me away from the Nader camp I'll need to see the following:
1. a firm commitment to peaceful conflict resolution.
2. a concerted effort to address the current corporate welfare state.
3. support for a universal healthcare plan.
4. support for the equal rights of gays and lesbians (including marriage, NOT a civil union)
5. opposition to The Patriot Act.
6. support for the Equal Rights Amendment (legislation that guarantees equality in pay, job opportunities, insurance, social security, and education for women). Can you believe we STILL haven't added this amendment to the Constitution. How ridiculous is that?
There's a good list of starting points, Mr. Kerry. You've got a long way to go and a short time to get there. Once you've shown me your ardent support for these positions, I'll post the next half dozen.
According to Democratic Presidential hopeful John Kerry, "I'll lure those who support Nader. Really? Well, he'd better get crackin'. To this point, I haven't seen anything that makes me want to vote for Bush-lite. To lure me away from the Nader camp I'll need to see the following:
1. a firm commitment to peaceful conflict resolution.
2. a concerted effort to address the current corporate welfare state.
3. support for a universal healthcare plan.
4. support for the equal rights of gays and lesbians (including marriage, NOT a civil union)
5. opposition to The Patriot Act.
6. support for the Equal Rights Amendment (legislation that guarantees equality in pay, job opportunities, insurance, social security, and education for women). Can you believe we STILL haven't added this amendment to the Constitution. How ridiculous is that?
There's a good list of starting points, Mr. Kerry. You've got a long way to go and a short time to get there. Once you've shown me your ardent support for these positions, I'll post the next half dozen.
STFU
There's a particular individual who insists on exposing me to pro-war propaganda by way of email and direct conversation. I receive letters sent home from soldiers in Iraq (most of which are written by the U.S. military and signed by soldiers--I've ranted about this before), jokes about the way U.S. personnel treat POWs, and reminders that the U.S. MUST bring democracy to the barbarians of the Middle East. In addition to the war talk, I also keep hearing about how "there are too many queers on television" and that the prospect of same sex marriage is ridiculous. Despite my repeated requests to stop, I've tried email and direct conversation, he just keeps on spouting the Republican Party line. He laps up the gruel he's fed by conservative pundits and regurgitates it to everyone within spewing distance. No unique thought, no analysis, and no critical engagement. If you're a regular reader of my blog, you know how well that message is received. The worst part of the entire situation is that he thinks my anger over these issues is funny. When I reach my limit, lose it, and rant about 10,000 civilian casualties in Iraq, he laughs and tells me I take the world too seriously. How can anyone laugh about all those people? I just don't get it.
I'm tempted to unleash my full, more-liberal-than-Ralph-Nader, fury but know anything I say will fall on deaf ears. If it doesn't come from Fox News, it's not legit. Unfortunately, I'm not really in a position to cut off all contact with him. Still, I can limit my interactions to once every several months. If I do some planning and benevolent lying, I could conceivably limit contact to a couple times a year.
I'm all about a good debate, but this has gone way beyond that point. I'll make one more attempt to get him to stop with the nonsense. If that doesn't work, I'll initiate Project Isolate and Ignore .
There's a particular individual who insists on exposing me to pro-war propaganda by way of email and direct conversation. I receive letters sent home from soldiers in Iraq (most of which are written by the U.S. military and signed by soldiers--I've ranted about this before), jokes about the way U.S. personnel treat POWs, and reminders that the U.S. MUST bring democracy to the barbarians of the Middle East. In addition to the war talk, I also keep hearing about how "there are too many queers on television" and that the prospect of same sex marriage is ridiculous. Despite my repeated requests to stop, I've tried email and direct conversation, he just keeps on spouting the Republican Party line. He laps up the gruel he's fed by conservative pundits and regurgitates it to everyone within spewing distance. No unique thought, no analysis, and no critical engagement. If you're a regular reader of my blog, you know how well that message is received. The worst part of the entire situation is that he thinks my anger over these issues is funny. When I reach my limit, lose it, and rant about 10,000 civilian casualties in Iraq, he laughs and tells me I take the world too seriously. How can anyone laugh about all those people? I just don't get it.
I'm tempted to unleash my full, more-liberal-than-Ralph-Nader, fury but know anything I say will fall on deaf ears. If it doesn't come from Fox News, it's not legit. Unfortunately, I'm not really in a position to cut off all contact with him. Still, I can limit my interactions to once every several months. If I do some planning and benevolent lying, I could conceivably limit contact to a couple times a year.
I'm all about a good debate, but this has gone way beyond that point. I'll make one more attempt to get him to stop with the nonsense. If that doesn't work, I'll initiate Project Isolate and Ignore .
Tuesday, May 18, 2004
I'm Free
Final papers have been returned, final exams have been graded, final grade bubble sheets have been bubbled and submitted to the appropriate departmental personnel. In other words, I'm done.
I'm free
I'm free
And freedom tastes of reality
I'm free
I'm free
And I'm waiting for you to follow me
Final papers have been returned, final exams have been graded, final grade bubble sheets have been bubbled and submitted to the appropriate departmental personnel. In other words, I'm done.
I'm free
I'm free
And freedom tastes of reality
I'm free
I'm free
And I'm waiting for you to follow me
Sunday, May 16, 2004
A Letter From Ralph Nader
This is why Nader will probably be getting my vote in November:
Dear Mr. President
Why isn't anyone else willing to ask these kinds of questions? You go, Ralph.
This is why Nader will probably be getting my vote in November:
Dear Mr. President
Why isn't anyone else willing to ask these kinds of questions? You go, Ralph.
Saturday, May 15, 2004
WTF Department: Apple Paltrow
Gwyneth Paltrow has named her new daughter, Apple. Seeing that Gwyneth has broken the fruit barrier, I thought it might be fun to throw out some other great names for children. If you could name a child after any fruit, what fruit would you pick? I think I'd go with honeydew melon.
Offer your fruit/name of choice in the comments.
Gwyneth Paltrow has named her new daughter, Apple. Seeing that Gwyneth has broken the fruit barrier, I thought it might be fun to throw out some other great names for children. If you could name a child after any fruit, what fruit would you pick? I think I'd go with honeydew melon.
Offer your fruit/name of choice in the comments.
Valid?
::student walks up to my desk at the front of the room during exam period and points to question 15::
Student: Is asking the author of an article a valid test question?
Me: Was the article and author listed on the study guide?
Student: Um, yeah.
Me: Was the article an assigned reading for the class?
Student: Uh, I don't know.
Me: It was on the syllabus and we discussed it in class. The question is valid. Good luck.
::student walks up to my desk at the front of the room during exam period and points to question 15::
Student: Is asking the author of an article a valid test question?
Me: Was the article and author listed on the study guide?
Student: Um, yeah.
Me: Was the article an assigned reading for the class?
Student: Uh, I don't know.
Me: It was on the syllabus and we discussed it in class. The question is valid. Good luck.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)